Is Vivian's so-called 'principled' posturing in parliament worth emulating?
When Singapore’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, Vivian Balakrishnan, dropped what many saw as a political bombshell in Parliament recently, I initially did not give it much thought. After all, it is well within his prerogative to articulate Singapore’s foreign‑policy position. Yet this immediately raises several important questions: Is this merely his personal stance? Is it fully shared by the Prime Minister Lawrence Wong? Does it reflect the consensus of Parliament—and, by extension, the Singaporean public? My reflection on his April 7 speech has little to do with a particular interest in tracking Singapore’s domestic political developments. Rather, it stems from a broader concern that certain questions of principle are worth examining, regardless of national boundaries. When he asserted that Singapore upholds the principle that the Strait of Hormuz belongs to the international maritime community rather than Iran, several issues arise. Q. Is he correct in...