All the Jigsaw Puzzles Put Together
There was news in the media that the
judge who sentenced the convict, Najib Abdul Razak to 12 years jail, was
suddenly investigated by the Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission.
Its commissioner, Azam Baki said this
was a “standard procedure” since police reports have been lodged against the
said trial judge, Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali, who presided over the court case
involving the former prime minister, for misappropriation of RM42 million of
SRC International Sdn Bhd’s funds.
If
this is true, then, many of us who have lodged police reports against certain
government officials would have to ask MACC why no action was done to even investigate
the allegations.
I believe police reports have also been
made against Azam himself, but why did Azam not go on leave so that a thorough investigation
could be carried out to clear his name? This could have been done at the very
least by the agency that he represents.
Whistleblower
At the same time when fugitive
Malaysian blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin made allegations against Mohd
Nazlan, we have another recent court
case, where former Finance Minister II, Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah “shed
some light today over why he resigned from his posts in Umno and Barisan
Nasional (BN), after resigning from his position as second finance minister in
June 2016.”
According
to Husni, he received a visit from then principal private secretary of Najib at
10pm one night, telling him that an ‘unknown person’ had contacted [blogger]
Raja Petra.
Husni
was told by his guest that night, “They will attack you tomorrow.” Husni told
the court: “What happened first was they attacked my son (Khalid Ahmad Husni).
He and the chairman of NPE (New Pantai Expressway Sdn Bhd) attended one
Economic Action Council meeting.
“The
Edge reported that the minutes of a meeting, which Husni attended, went to Raja
Petra. He published on Facebook, saying that I was angry at Najib because my son
did not get a RM2 billion contract."
Bingo!
Raja Petra had taken on the honour to attack Husni, therefore, there is no
surprise that he is doing the same to Nazlan with the same agenda. Character
assassination seems to be the order of the day, even if the party targeted is
not guilty.
Knowing
the former Member of Parliament of Tambun personally, although we have not met
personally, is an added advantage. I asked if he would return to politics
again, and his answer was: “I think my time is over.”
I have
known Husni as a humble person who, despite being a minister, was willing to
respond to complaints from his constituents. So, my argument is: If he had big
stakes in contracts, he would not give up politics that easily.
Here is
one good man in Barisan Nasional similar to Anifah Aman, but unfortunately,
they never last long enough to get to the top because they are swimming in the
wrong sea.
According
to the same report, Raja Petra “obtained the minutes (of the said meeting)
right after the meeting concluded.” We can all see that all the artillery,
including “Umno-controlled Utusan Malaysia” was aimed at Husni.
A similar story can be told about
former Sarawak chief minister, Taib Mahmud. When a certain party could not get its
way to enter into Sarawak politics, the attempt was to remove Taib.
But, what
happened after several weeks of MACC pursuing Taib? Then MACC chief
commissioner, Shukri Abdull said the MACC was “unable
to take action against former Sarawak governor Tun Abdul Taib Mahmud
although 15 case files had been opened against him.”
We are all Nazlan
What people are generally fed up is to
see the country is in such a sad state like this that even a trial judge is now
being implicated. I trust that the other judges would be more resolved to stand
up for justice.
After all, didn’t we all read that as
early as March 14, a news
portal suddenly had already reported that a
group of people wanted judge Nazlan to be arrested.
Common sense tells us that hashtags
such as #TangkapHakimNazlanBebasNajib and #ArrestJudgeNazlanFreeNajib are
seditious, no? Yet, why were these people not arrested for sedition or contempt
of court?
Nazlan himself has lodged
a police report against Raja Petra, and we are all waiting to see if
the fugitive blogger will be extradited back to Malaysia.
Assuming that even if Nazlan had not
lodged a police report, the MACC also can still lodge a police report against
Raja Petra, just as it did in
March 2019, when the blogger published “several documents on his
blog, which he claimed were MACC investigation papers on the tunnel and related
road projects in Penang.”
If you ask me, the country should not
be held at ransom by one fugitive by the name of Raja Petra or a convicted
kleptokrat, Najib. The cases involving Najib and the others should be
expedited. Justice has to be seen done.
END.
Comments
Post a Comment